![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
http://www.wnbc.com/health/14814059/detail.html?dl=headlineclick
I do it for Alan anyway, but hopefully there won't be a shortage as there was a few years ago.
I do it for Alan anyway, but hopefully there won't be a shortage as there was a few years ago.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-12 08:45 am (UTC)If we attribute the rise in autism to exposure to the mercury-based preservative, why have diagnoses continued to rise, even after the same chemical has disappeared from common use as an antiseptic, and declined as a preservative? (I used the antiseptic under the brand name "Mercurochrome" a lot as a kid. It was nice because he toughened the skin as it healed, and didn't sting when applied.) Exposure in that form was vastly more common than exposure as a vaccine preservative.
Isn't it a lot more likely that diagnoses of autism have increased because children previously labeled as "retarded" or otherwise not "normal" are now diagnosed as autistic?
(This isn't directed at you, obviously.)